Category talk:Physics-related stubs

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Question[edit]

Since these are stubs, you'd like someone to expand them, right? Would that fall in RW's mission? (And maybe this is a stupid question but...if we think the articles we have now are good enough, why don't we just remove the stub labels from them?) --Andynot Schlafly 11:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

A good question. We have a load of non-mission stubs which are better answered at ToW. In my view we need only focus on the ones for which we can add some on-mission slant which is not otherwise covered by WP. The rest need to be pruned out. Don't forget the mantra "we are not an encyclopedia". Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 11:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Centralized page or vote as we go? ТyBother me 17:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
A centralized page would probably focus people's minds more. Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 17:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Forumspace ok? ТyBother me 17:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
A lot of them can be expanded and I fail to see how physics could be off mission. While I know we are not an encyclopedia we are also a group of people very much interested in science. Acei9 00:53, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Science also encompasses biology, chemistry, astronomy, geology... Sam Tally-ho! 02:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)