User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 04:04, 31 July 2021 diff hist -3,148 m Sheila Jeffreys The discussion, in relation to the changes made to this article, have already been discussed on the (my?) talk page. Stop reverting it. I've already pointed out that this biased editing does nothing. It is nonsensical and lies.
- 03:31, 31 July 2021 diff hist -978 m Janice Raymond Removed the right-wing, anti-feminist edits to Janice Raymond's page. Additionally, the clarification of what she meant by 'mandating transsexualism out of existence' has been properly provided, in terms of her response.
- 03:00, 31 July 2021 diff hist -3,148 m Sheila Jeffreys Fixed the weird, right-wing misrepresentation of Jeffreys's beliefs.
- 02:29, 31 July 2021 diff hist +489 User talk:SomethingAboutSomething
- 18:54, 6 July 2021 diff hist -363 Germaine Greer
- 18:06, 6 July 2021 diff hist +692 User talk:SomethingAboutSomething
- 21:14, 1 June 2021 diff hist +433 User talk:SomethingAboutSomething
- 20:44, 1 June 2021 diff hist +5,094 User talk:SomethingAboutSomething lol get fuck dickhead
- 14:51, 1 June 2021 diff hist -117 Sheila Jeffreys Except, she does show evidence, discussing the issue of social pressure, when it arrives to women wearing makeup and so on. Did you even read any portion of that book by her...? Even non-radfems know this. You're literally denying oppression.
- 13:43, 1 June 2021 diff hist -372 Essay:I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki Not a good example to link to something which literally debunks an entire article written on this site, huh? Yeah, no. Deleted. When you have any level of argumentation, you can post the link. Until then, don't. Leave feminists alone.
- 12:51, 1 June 2021 diff hist +2,564 User talk:SomethingAboutSomething
- 16:58, 31 May 2021 diff hist +876 User talk:SomethingAboutSomething
- 16:18, 31 May 2021 diff hist -3,770 Sheila Jeffreys Undo revision 2330747 by GeeJayK (talk)
- 16:14, 31 May 2021 diff hist -3,770 m Sheila Jeffreys The page presents no arguments against Sheila Jeffreys' sentiments, and, in fact, is extremely immature. None of it engages her ideas. Here, I've revised things, so that her views are just presented, but not in any particular way.
- 16:03, 31 May 2021 diff hist -688 m Trans-exclusionary radical feminist →Collaborations with the far-right
- 16:03, 31 May 2021 diff hist -2,462 m Trans-exclusionary radical feminist Undo revision 2330738 by GrammarCommie (talk)
- 16:00, 31 May 2021 diff hist -1 Trans-exclusionary radical feminist →Similarities to wingnuts
- 16:00, 31 May 2021 diff hist -2,461 m Trans-exclusionary radical feminist The mentions, on this page, of any feminists agreeing with the right on issues surrounding transgender politics is extremely misleading. An observation is an observation, but it doesn't imply feminists and the right see, to any degree, eye to eye.