Template:Ken debate

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dear horrible Anonymous User and friends at a rather liberal website starting with an R,

RE: Your previous comment which I ignored due to the utter weakness of the atheist position and strength of the Christian position

1. You and the other members of your rather arrogant atheist website which falsely purports to be "rational" are too obese and mentally challenged to find any inaccuracies in Conservapedia's articles that focus on atheism, evolution, or homosexuality, which were all largely edited by me. Regarding the sad fact that there is no proof or evidence that any of these worldviews are true and correct, it wasn't really challenging for us to create some articles that thoroughly attempt to offer arguments pertaining to these worldviews.

2. I bravely defeated you folks on the talk pages of the Conservapedia articles that they were rather unsurprisingly angered by, plus on other places on the internet as well (atheism, evolution, homosexuality, etc.) Going from there, your claim that I am afraid to debate has no merit. I am apparently not claiming that it is regarding my excellent debating prowess that I won so many debates with you folks from a certain website starting with an R, it is just that atheism is such an incredibly baseless position with a glass jaw and a flabby midsection - especially compared to Christianity, which, however, has overwhelming evidence to support it.

3. I met my goals that I sought to achieve in terms of my participation with Conservapedia, the Trustworthy Encyclopedia. Anything else that I do further is just icing on the cake.

4. Encyclopedias often involve multiple editors and personally, I haven't seen a single encyclopedia that I fully agree with. Feel free to cry at Conservapedia and find inconsistencies in it, but I really don't think that you can find a single factual error in the Conservapedia articles in regards to atheism, evolution, or homosexuality.

5. I know that it aggravates to no end that I have met my goals and hereby declare VICTORY, since I have the ability as a Conservapedia sysop to block anyone who has the nerve to be militant towards me, and yet you still want to find fault in me. However, I have still succeeded in being more like my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ once and for all, in that I have delivered yet another punch to your flabby midsection! You on the other hand, have also succeeded at being more like your Lord and Savior PZ Meyers, in that you also look largely unattractive, also believe that women and men should be treated equal (!), and are also very large around the waist!

In regards to all of that, I hereby challenge you to A SECOND WRITTEN DEBATE. In this debate, I challenge you to prove to me that atheism is true and correct (which you probably won't be able to do anyway, due to the inherent glass jaw of atheism), and once I achieve victory, it will all but destroy atheism on the internet ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

However, it will only be under THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS (in bold):

  • In case you attempt to martyr me in your anger as a result of my inevitable VICTORY, I get to bring with me a largely defensive weapon of gun.
  • You are to pay an exact total of $45,000.00 $5,000,000, which will be donated by a trustworthy bible-believer of your choosing to a faith-based Christian charitable organization of your choosing upon successful completion of the debate.
  • The debate will be written, and will be 5 hours long (which can be broken up over a 95 month period).

6. Well so long, you obese, militant, atheistic, and probably homosexual commie! Oh, and one more piece of Christian love for Horrible Anonymous User: I hope you go and kill yourself! Nobody loves you, and your passing will not be mourned! God will laugh as he throws you into the lake of fire, as you will finally be unable to deny that he is real!

DISCLAIMER: It's not that I hate you, it's just that I don't want you to exist. >:-b

Sincerely,

Conservative