File talk:Aschlafly.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Holy shit! A portrait of the Assfly as a young man - good work, fella! --Robledo 20:36, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, an excellent find, Coarb. Do tell how you came across this! Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:55, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
- Hmmm. Should we really host this image? Isn't it a bit... [word I have forgotten]?
- Incidentally, that's the exact same expression he has in his other picture. Did he even move in between the times they were taken? ↳
↑
⇨
↕
▽
←
22:57, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
- Even his head's tilt to his right is the same. NightFlareStill doesn't have a (nonstub) RWW article. 17:42, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
I found it in the PDF of one of the papers that Schlafly published. The paper was mentioned in Talk:WIGO. Coarb 04:41, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
Do we need it?[edit]
Are we just being creepy here? Is there a reason for keeping this since it doesn't really relate much to the guy we make fun of now? --Kels 20:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd support deletion. No reason to keep, plus the stalk factor. Mei 21:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bad photo, tells us absolutely zero we don't already know, and isn't it a bit of a cheap shot to make fun of an engineering grad because he looks geeky? That's almost a tautology, isn't it? --Kels 21:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Aww..I love this picture. It makes me feel like Aschlafly was once human (and apparently useful). I'd hate to see it go. Neveruse513 21:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- You can print a copy out and keep it near your heart. --Kels 21:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Aww..I love this picture. It makes me feel like Aschlafly was once human (and apparently useful). I'd hate to see it go. Neveruse513 21:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bad photo, tells us absolutely zero we don't already know, and isn't it a bit of a cheap shot to make fun of an engineering grad because he looks geeky? That's almost a tautology, isn't it? --Kels 21:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)